Oil Market Research One Of The Sector Georgia Monopoly - 275 Words

Oil Market Research One Of The Sector Georgia Monopoly (Term Paper Sample) Content: The MonopolyStudents NameInstitutionDateThe MonopolyOil market is one of the sector in Georgia that is monopoly. I consider this sector to be monopolistic because it is the least competitive market in Georgia. The oil market is controlled by large companies which act the same to each other. For example, Sun Petroleum Georgia is oil company that dominates the market. The price of oil increases in accordance with Sun Petroleum Georgia. Due to this, the share of other small oil traders such as Rompetrol Georgia has been dropping while the shares for Sun Petroleum Georgia has been growing tremendously. The importation, production and distribution of oil in Georgia is controlled by this company. Despite of its vital role of promoting oil market in Georgia, by being dominant in the market, the price of oil is very high. The markup on oil is higher than the normal rate in other European nations (The Financial News , 2013).Response 1HelloI agree with you that Netflix is a do minant movie supplier over other companies such as Comcast because it leads in distributing the movies through the internet. Unlike other businesses, Netflix provides a platform where clients can stream live movies through the web hence accessing many customers than those companies that still use DVDs. It is important to note that Netflix is growing very fast and it might buy other movies companies to avoid competitions in the future.Re...

The Mysterious Moon of Makemake

As weve explored in other stories, the outer solar system is really the new frontier of space exploration. This region, also called​  the Kuiper Belt, is populated with many icy, distant and small worlds that were once completely unknown to us. Pluto is the largest among them known (so far), and was visited in 2015 by the New Horizons mission.   The Hubble Space Telescope has the visual acuity to make out tiny worlds in the Kuiper Belt. For example, it resolved the moons of Pluto, which are very small. In its exploration of the Kuiper Belt, HST spotted a moon orbiting a world smaller than Pluto called Makemake. Makemake was discovered in 2005 via ground-based observations and is one of five known dwarf planets in the solar system. Its name comes from the natives of Easter Island, who saw Makemake as the creator of humanity and a god of fertility. Makemake was discovered shortly after Easter, and so the discoverers wanted to use a name in keeping with the word. The moon of Makemake is called MK 2, and it covers a pretty wide orbit around its parent body. Hubble spotted this little moon as it was about 13,000 miles away from Makemake. The world Makemake itself is only about 1434 kilometers (870 miles) wide and was discovered in 2005 via ground-based observations, and then further observed with HST. MK2 is perhaps only 161 kilometers (100 miles) across, so finding this tiny little world around a small dwarf planet was quite an accomplishment. What Does Makemakes Moon Tell us? When Hubble and other telescopes discover worlds in the distant solar system, they deliver a treasure trove of data to planetary scientists. At Makemake, for example, they can measure the length of the moons orbit. That allows researchers to calculate MK 2s orbit. As they find more moons around Kuiper Belt objects, planetary scientists can make some assumptions about the likelihood of other worlds having satellites of their own. In addition, as scientists study MK 2 in greater detail, they can figure out more about its density. That is, they can determine whether its made of rock or a rock-ice mix, or is an all-ice body. In addition, the shape of MK 2s orbit will tell them something about where this moon came from, that is, was it captured by Makemake, or did it form in place? Its history is likely very ancient, dating back to the origin of the solar system. Whatever we learn about this moon will also tell us something about conditions in the early epochs of solar system history, whe n worlds were forming and migrating.   Whats It Like on This Distant Moon? We dont really know all the details of this very distant moon, yet. It will take years of observations to nail down its atmospheric and surface compositions. Although planetary scientists dont have an actual picture of the surface of MK 2, they know enough to present us with an artists concept of what it might look like. It appears to have a very dark surface, likely due to discoloration by ultraviolet from the Sun and loss of bright, icy material to space. That little factoid comes NOT from a direct observation, but from an interesting side-effect of observing Makemake itself. Planetary scientists studied Makemake in infrared light and kept seeing a few areas that seemed warmer than they should be. It turns out what they may have been seeing as dark warmer patches were likely the dark-colored moon itself.   The realm of the outer solar system and the worlds it contains have a lot of hidden information about what conditions were like when the planets and moons were forming. Thats because this region of space is a veritable deep-freeze. It preserves ancient ices in much the same state they were when they formed during the birth of the Sun and planets.   Yet, that doesnt mean things dont change out there. On the contrary; there is plenty of change in the Kuiper Belt. On some worlds, such as Pluto, there ARE processes that heat and change the surface. That means that worlds DO change in ways that scientists are just beginning to understand. No longer does the term frozen wasteland mean that the region is dead. It simply means that temperatures and pressures out in the Kuiper Belt result in very different-looking and behaving worlds. Studying the Kuiper Belt is an ongoing process. There are many, many worlds out there to find—and eventually explore. Hubble Space Telescope, as well as several ground-based observatories are the front line of Kuiper Belt studies. Eventually, the James Webb Space Telescope will be set to work observing this region too, helping astronomers locate and chart the many bodies that still live out in the solar systems deep freeze.

Doryphoros Essay - 793 Words

Doryphoros by Polykleitos was originally a Greek bronze made around 450-40B.C. The only way we can see it today is through the Roman marble copies (which is common of many Greek statues.) Some supports had to be added for the change in material, resulting in the addition of the form resembling a tree trunk, the support on the left foot, and the small bar bridging the gap between his right wrist and hip. Doryphoros was originally holding a spear in his left hand; appropriate, given that his name means, literally, â€Å"spear-bearer.† The sculpture is a well-known and early example of classical Greek contrapposto (the shifting of weight onto one leg and off-axis shoulders and arms.) One leg nearly appears to be lifting off the ground, giving the†¦show more content†¦Plato felt that artists knew nothing worth mentioning because all they do is imitate, and so their work was worthless. Additionally, Plato believed that we, as humans not of the metaphysical realm, can not know what true beauty is because we have not experienced the true, beautiful form of anything. Plato would say that Doryphoros was worthless for those very reasons. It is an imitation of a perfect form, and therefore cannot be beautiful. Although Doryphoros is anatomically and proportionally realistic, Plato would not be appreciative of it as art and would not see it as an object of beauty. He would likely scorn Polykleitos for even bothering to sculpt it in the first place. To examine the thoughts of another Greek philosopher, Aristotle would have a much different perspective on Doryphoros. Aristotle felt that imitation was natural for us as humans. He felt that we could learn from imagery that is realistic because it may influence us to examine it more closely. He felt that the creative individual could express the universal, fundamental qualities of human nature, and did not see their work as worthless as Plato did. Polykleitos sculpted athletic nudes such as Doryphoros in ordina nce to his mathematical canon, aShow MoreRelatedMen Sculptures From Ancient Art867 Words   |  4 Pagesfound in the 1790 in Tivoli, Italy near the Roman emperor’s villa. The statue underwent restoration by Varlo Albacini, a renowned restorer. The next sculpture is the Doryphoros. It dates back to the 440 B.C also known as the high classical period. The artist behind the art is Polykleitos.   It is recorded that he made the Doryphoros as an example of perfect proportion. I think this sculpture is most similar to the Lansdowne Herakles. The sculpture sits on right side of the leg, making the similarRead MoreFinal Business Plan1230 Words   |  5 Pages | False | 13. | Cyclopean | | are huge boulders that were used in the construction of fortified walls and masonry. | 14. | Cyclopean masonry was used on the Citadel in Tiryns. | | True | 15. | Doryphoros | | s the perfect example of the canon of proportions. | 16. | Egyptian art will have a profound influence on Greek art. | | True | 17. | Egyptians were not concerned with the afterlife. | | False Read MorePortrait of Augustus as General1323 Words   |  6 PagesRoman religion. Looking in details, his standing pose and the entire composition are similar to another portrait, â€Å"Polykleitos Doryphoros†, which came from Greek art; He stands in a contrapposto pose with all of his weight on his right leg and with his right arm rose demonstrate that the emperor is addressing his troops. His idealized hair is also similar to Doryphoros’, and they were both portrayed as youthful and flawless individuals with the perfect body because the artist wanted to depict AugustusRead MoreUsing Art For A Message2077 Words   |  9 Pagesancient Greece is also known for the ideal human body, the most notorious work reflecting this idea is Doryphoros. Though the Greeks were not the first to sculpt their ideal body, they were the first to base their canon on proportions. Like the Parthenon, Doryphoros also follows the teachings of Pythagoras, and was therefore calculated to be perfectly proportional by the sculptor, Polykleitos. Doryphoros also exemplifies cont rapposto, counterbalance, which, â€Å"impose[d] order on human movement†¦ to ‘perfect’Read MoreAn Analysis of the Play Medea by Euripides1410 Words   |  6 Pagescom/2010/02/04/man-knowledge-the-greek-philosophers/ Unknown. (2009). Medea- An Abandonment of Gender Roles. Retrieved from Big Wonk: http://www.bigwonk.com/show.php?eid=1683 Unknown. (2009, February 9). The Doryphoros. Retrieved from Arts Connected: http://www.artsconnected.org/resource/5851/the-doryphoros Whitley, T. (2011, September 8). The Ideal Greek Man. Retrieved from Thomas Whitley: http://thomaswhitley.com/2011/09/08/the-ideal-greek-man/Read More Art and History Displayed at the Pompeii Exhibition at LACMA819 Words   |  4 Pagesgreeting to the exhibitors. She stood in the middle welcoming us with a soft and warm smile. Through this sculpture we view how the Pompeii artist was following the Greek perception of the human body such as what we see in Polykleitos’ sculpture, Doryphoros; Aphrodite stands with the weight shifted on to her left foot portraying the cross balance of the human body. Once we appreciate the first art room we are then presented with various pieces of the gardens that were found around the Bay of NaplesRead MorePrehistoric Art Study Guide883 Words   |  4 PagesPediment sculpture from Temple of Zeus, Olympia (Lapiths and Centaurs; Chariot Race) †¢ Acropolis at Athens: architecture and sculpture (including the layout of the complex and arch itectural styles used); special focus on the Parthenon †¢ Polykleitos, Doryphoros (Spear-bearor) †¢ Lysippos, The Scraper †¢ Praxiteles, Hermes and Infant Dionysos †¢ Apollonius (?), Old Boxer †¢ Altar of Zeus, Pergamon (including sources, subjects of the sculptures and their Hellenistic stylistic features) †¢ Dying Gaul (from monumentRead MoreHellenistic Times And Classical Times844 Words   |  4 Pagesexplain the differences between the two and showcase the contributions that both eras gave to the world at the time they were made. One example of a piece of art that displays the differences between Classical Times and Hellenistic Times would be the Doryphoros (Spear-Bearer) (c. 450-440 BCE), a sculpture made by Polykleitos. Polykleitos made this art piece during the Classical Times and based it on two core principles of the Canon, composition and commensurability, both residing in mathematical proportionsRead More Comparing Roman and Greek Art Essay example1185 Words   |  5 Pagesaccomplishment in itself showed strong advancements in intellectual thought, and inspired future generations to further explore aesthetic and order. Artist such as Polyclitius later envisioned human perfection as a series of mathematical proportions. The Doryphoros, a sculpture done by Polycleatus himself, serves as an excellent example of how art reflects philosophical thought. This sculpture was constructed using a strict mathematical formula that was believed to represent the perfect male body. (CunninghamRead MoreThe Sublime And The Beautiful1457 Words   |  6 Pagessublime moves us more profoundly than the beautiful. Beautiful objects tend to be smooth, small and delicate, while sublime ones are vast, gloomy, dark and threatening. Put in perspective, beautiful objects can be dolls, porcelain sets or Polykleitos’ Doryphoros, which produce immediate pleasure. Sublime scenes relate to thunderstorms and mountaintops, which overwhelm us, paradoxically however, peaking over a mountaintop one can find delight in terror, and the sheer power is exhilarating. The sublime is

British India And Revolution Essay Research Paper free essay sample

British India And Revolution Essay, Research Paper The struggle and contention environing events in India during the British business helped give rise to many conflicting thoughts about British regulation. Although they varied in grade, the ultimate thoughts would oppugn the authorization of British laterality, overall. Interpretation of Rebellious events during the 19th century between British and Nationalist authors, expose the differing sentiment of the two groups. The British of course aspired to understate any Acts of the Apostless of rebellion, while their Indian opposite numbers attempted to overstate the importance of these events, as a agency of advancing the patriot cause. Indian concerns with British regulation began to derive impulse as certain events taking topographic point in British India were get downing to blossom against the British. Hearsay and other propagandistic elements had begun taking its topographic point among Indians, rapidly altering sentiment towards the British. One of these was the widespread belief that the British were fixing to level the caste system and change over India to Christianity. Although this was non factual, the subsequent actions of British functionaries did nil to chase away the rumours, and Brahmins began to fearfully question British motivations. The rebellion in 1857 can be seen as caused by the roll uping grudges of the Sepoy Army of Bengal. Certain factors contributed to the impairment of morale amongst the Sepoy ground forces that was comprised of Brahmins and other high caste Hindus who assisted in advancing a focal point of sedition. The hapless criterion of British officers and the deficiency of betterment to the overall place of work forces functioning in the ground forces besides increased seditious inclinations. These military grudges which were important were non themselves enough to motivate rebellion, it took a sensed onslaught on the Sepoy spiritual establishments to trip the rebellion. English ignorance and indifference can besides be seen in the distribution of the Enfield rifle. Its distinguishable ammo required the slug to be bitten before lading. Rumors that the lubricating oil used on the slugs was either from the fat of cowss or hogs, which was disrespectful to both Hindus and Muslims, was interpreted as assailing at the nucleus of the Hindu and Muslim spiritual beliefs. These rumours unlike those sing the transition to Christianity and dismantlement of the caste system did turn out to be true, and the British withdrew the obnoxious lubricating oil. These events account for the military facets of the rebellion which display the version of events accepted in official British circles. This version preferred by the British authors fails to admit an unprecedented degree of widespread agitation among ordinary Indians, who saw the British authorities # 8217 ; s actions as disrespectful and apathetic towards long established regulations and imposts # 8217 ; . Indian patriots saw the causes of the rebellion as non being caused by unhappy soldiers of the Bengal ground forces, but as a reaction of the influential categories of India, which had lost trust in British authorization. Still other British saw the overall societal state of affairs and British disposal as holding no consequence in doing the rebellion. The popular beliefs of functionaries like Sir John Lawrence believed that the immediate cause of the rebellion was the concerns held by Sepoys over the new ammo for the Enfield rifles. However, he sees this as merely the trigger incident, with the root cause being the long-run decrease in subject in the ground forces and the hapless criterion of officers in bid, connoting that British power Begin to form ground forces subject through the ranks. The British point of view was to see rebellious events as a Mutiny. Here once more the British overlook the engagement of the civilian population, who was besides involved in changing grades, of anti British activity. For most of the British authors and perceivers of the events, they agreed in naming it a mutiny for public dealingss grounds. The term mutiny does non transport the same affectional force as the word rebellion. It would non arouse images of widespread activities of noncompliance towards British authorization, hence avoiding any sort of bandwagon consequence on the multitudes. The Indian nationalist position of the events of 1857 is that it was non as the British believe a series of stray and uncoordinated mutinies. It was a war of independency, the first act by Indians to derive self-rule, and the incident represented a turning point in which the nationali st feelings, long suppressed by the British business, flared into force. For half a century after 1857 the composing on the rebellion were fundamentally confined to British perceivers and bookmans. After the mutiny of 1857 the mode of disposal had become much sterner with the British clearly moving like an busying power, patroling a hostile land. We see the displacement in British accent on military security and cautious disposal. The British saw the demand to cut down the hazard of a 2nd rebellion. As mentioned by Tagore, the British adopted the policies that would make division among the civil population into the following century. Marx states They [ English ] destroyed it [ India } by interrupting up the native communities, by deracinating the native industry, and by leveling all that was great and elevated in the native society. The nationalist motion sought to reconstruct province protection to Islam and Hinduism, turn toing the spiritual division of Indians with a common battle. Theodore Morrison well exposes the division among Indians to back up an English controlled India. He states that English politicians fail to recognize that, India has no sentiment of nationality and that political parties in India are formed from deep seated hates which have earlier now deluged the state with blood, and which would make so once more were it non for the fright of British bayonets. The overall impairment in dealingss between the British and their Indian topics during the terminal of the nineteenth century, found the Muslims losing much of the influence and power they had held earlier. While the overall British attitude changed towards the Indians, the most ill will was aimed at the Muslim community. Moslems were blamed by the British for much of the rebellious activity, and being against western instruction they were denied upward mobility for some clip, while more favourable Hindus were profiting from English instruction and benefited under the authorities. Theodore Morison remarked on the headlong administrative inclination of the British, sing British laterality over Muslims in India. my sentiment [ it was ] an unwise measure to make off with the Muhammadan Law Officers by an act of Legislature. Morison besides mentions the spiritual responsibility of Muslims to arise against foreign Masterss one of these [ Muslims ] first responsibilities is rebellion against an Infidel Conqueror. He besides mentions the sensitive state of affairs sing the Muslim Indians in return for this just sum of spiritual and civil autonomy, as their male parents have accepted the place of topics. if nevertheless their English Governors should conflict the silent understanding by interfering with supplications or public worship so wholesome out-migration or flight ( rebellion ) becomes incumbent on every devout Muslim. we may hold recently trenched hazardously near upon these conditions. By the center of the 19th century the divisions of race was a popular subject in Victorian England. The footing for these positions were no longer regarded every bit merely being as personal belief, it was now considered a scientific fact by the publication in 1859 of Charles Darwin # 8217 ; s, Origin of the Species which now gave British sentiment a factual support. The Darwinian thoughts introduced into English society justified imperialistic political policies and societal motions. At the bend of the century England perceived their dominant function in the universe as justified by Darwinian rules Darwin mentioned civilised states as superior, and referred to autochthonal people as barbarians, moreover, he referred to them as folks while mentioning to the English as a race. The English used this as justification to rule an India perceived as clustered into separate folks of peoples. Their administrative policies reflected this attitude. Unfortunately the Darwinian rules adopted by the English to warrant socially restraining policy in India made them overrate themselves, in footings of carry throughing a societal domination over the population. At a clip when Indian discord was turning, the British authorization found a popular and supportive doctrine to warrant stricter policy. The stratification of human existences harmonizing to race is pragmatically stated by Marx. Arabs, Turks, Tartars, Moguls, who had antecedently conquered India shortly became Hinduised, the barbaric vanquishers being, by an ageless jurisprudence of history, conquered themselves by the superior civilisation of their topics. The British were the first vanquishers superior, and hence, unaccessible to Hindu civilisation.